Well that's that finished, spent about 2 hrs on Friday explaining Clark and Chalmers thesis, and then about 4 hrs on Saturday setting out the case against their ideas. Today spent an hour editing and getting the word count below 2,000.
I'll leave it for a couple of days and give it a final read before submitting.
Wonder, if I can get a head start on he final chapter, Politics, had a quick look at the next TMA question and it looks a ridiculously long question,
‘Citizens only have obligations towards their state if that state is broadly just. States that exhibit large economic inequalities between citizens are not broadly just. So citizens can have no obligations to such states.’ Is this a sound argument?
No comments:
Post a Comment